Dan Winter, author and esotericist, reviews the Emanation of the Solfeggio research paper. We are very excited that Dan Winter, noted author and researcher has given positive comments and enthusiastic support to our work on the Emanation of the Solfeggio. Please Click Here to read Dan Winter's website: Soul Invitation.
It is an honor to have Mr. Winter accept our contribution (The Emanation of the Solfeggio) into his research circle, and we look forward to a great working relationship in the coming months and years.

Dr. Leonard Horowitz, graduate and past faculty member of Harvard University, past faculty member of Tufts University, author of such books as... Emerging Viruses: AIDS and Ebola -- Nature, Accident or Intentional? DNA: Pirates of the Sacerd Spiral Healing Codes for the Biological Apocalypse (coauthored with Dr. Joseph S.Puleo) has reviewed the Emanation of the Solfeggio research paper. We are so honored that Dr. Horowitz has given his encouragement and positive comments to us regarding our work on the Solfeggio frequencies. Dr. Horowitz wrote: "Your research is precisely what I was hoping someone with your resources and talents would do with "The Perfect Circle of Sound." It is nice to know that at least three of us realize we stand on the threshold of being, owning, and manifesting our dreams. With this knowledge and hydrosonics, our world is transforming." and, "Keep up the great work!" Please Click Here to read Dr. Horowitz's Holy Harmony website. And, Please Click Here to read Dr. Horowitz's Holy Harmony website.
And, please Click Here to read the Breath of the Earth website.
Dr. Horowitz's books can be obtained at this location Please Click Here for a list of current books.

The following are excerpts of a review sent to us by Mr. Robert Deane, and are reprinted here with his personal permission! The comments, due to webspace, are kept to a minimum and while the review was extremely precise in suggestions for change (down to the image numbering level and issues involving word wrap), we are posting the comments for the public to see concerning the crux of the paper- the construction the musicology of the Solfeggio Cube. Should anyone wish his full review, please personally contact Marcia McDowell, M.A. as we would be happy to supply it.

Very soon, we expect to have a full review posted, by a 33 year esotericist and musicologist, containing critical feedback concerning the Tree of Life work! We thank all the great people out there for their honest, constructive, and critical comments. Use of their comments will be subsumed into our future publications, and into the "Emanation of the Solfeggio" as reprints are requested, or errors confirmed in this "work in progress".

**********

Positive Feedback on the Solfeggio Report

1. Brief Personal Background of ReviewerBefore I retired, I was working a large Aerospace firm in BC Canada. I am also widely read in topics generally considered esoteric and ancient history, and my personal library of over 1000 books covers a very wide range of such subjects . It was a delight to meet many familiar topics in this report, but I can NOT usefully comment on the Hebrew aspects, about which I know to only a limited amount; instead I will concentrate on other aspects. Please accept these comments in the spirit of positive helpfulness in which they are sent.

Part 3

A general comment. I found the separated LR and RL Frequency Cubes very helpful indeed in following the rest of your report.
Below the cubes, there are three concepts included, so one needs to add ", and the cutting edge work by Charles William…" To me, this paragraph is too long and complex, and would be better split up, and to use an "Also" to introduce the last concept.
Under the acoustic Cube Drawing. "so to frequencies.." should read either as so two frequencies… or "so too frequencies…". It is not really clear what is intended here.
At bottom of the page the arrows ----> imply that further numbers follow, but this is not true here so just enclose the statements as in (to the "arbitrary" right) with no arrows
Above Figure RL SOLFEGGIO FREQUENCIES OVERLAY…….
The sentence
...@by adding the Gematria value of the like numbers(ex. 1 + 1 + 1 = 600 +40 + 5 = 645)"
took me quite a while to understand. This was partly because the plus sign is used for both logical and arithmetic addition operations, and the equals sign is used for both transformation operation (from digits to letter values) and for arithmetic addition in the same __expression. The word "numbers" should perhaps be "digits", and the logic addition be "&", while a transformation is often expressed by a forward arrow. So I would suggest writing this is a form such as:
we derive a 147 - 258 - 369 sequence by adding the Gematria values of the letters corresponding to single digits. Following the weave of each individual single digit, we find for example that
(1 & 1 & 1) => 600+40+5 = 645
The numbers on the figure that follows are then clearer, and the coloured arrows help to spot the anagram sequences. Since the word anagram usually implies letters to most people I suggest inserting the word "numeric" as in: "produce numeric anagrams in a like manner..." on the next page.
Part 4
Fig D. Label should not include "3-"; the significance of the 3 is utterly lost on me. Also, it seems to me that several frequencies "rub up against" the four hypercube columns such as 369 between the top arms of the H, and 258 between the lower arms of the H. The real reason seems to be that 369 is the only difference frequency that also "rubs up against" the H. Perhaps, some reconsideration should be given to the sentences above that figure.
Below Fig F (dewrap the text here below the figure).
Last paragraph of page "relationships hat lead" should read "relationships that lead"
Fig G
It would be helpful to specifically give the subtractions below Fig G, as in
Note 543 – 147 = 396
516 – 147 = 369
Above Fig L and M, there is a figure missing that is supplied with the high-res set, called 273_base.jpg. It fits between the second and third paragraph above Fig L.Part 5
In the high-res handwitten set, fig HW6 and HW6a are reversed, but correct on the report.
Fig N. There is also a shared 543 central column not marked in this figure.
Fig HW 7 contains an error. The top back right box should be 6 not 4
Fig S Two extra horizontal arrows for 396 Hz are missing.
Fig HW 1a is included with the Figures , but not used in the report. Probably not needed either.
There is no summary to this segment of the report and no explanation as to why certain frequency groups are excluded such as
246, 825, 579 and 273, 852, 579 and 579, 948, 369 and 285, 963,678 (a Solfeggio differnce also) and all 7 of the 333 groups.

I have taken the liberty of enclosing a spreadsheet of the 37 independent difference frequency triplets in the hypercube with the corresponding Fig. numbers in your report. Some such chart at this should be included in this part of the report to draw it all together.

Concluding remarks.
An interesting study; of note is that there is only one hypercube frequency difference which is equal to the Solfeggio frequency 528 Hz, and that is the triple (285, 813, 528). I feel sure that these frequencies have some healing properties. For example, one can produce .wav files containing just these 3 frequencies using a good audio editor such as Cool Edit Pro and then burn to a CDROM for listening off line.

Other possibilities include Neurophones for injecting sounds directly into the body issues.
But these are all speculations, not covered by this report. Thank you for the chance to partake. Good luck with the final result. I fear it may be greeted by many calls "the work of the devil" by less enlightened individuals. Fear not; there are others out there who will appreciate your efforts, and we look forward to more in the future.

Robert Deane.

**********